European Neighbourhood Monitor

Online magazine highlighting research, news and analysis covering the European Neighbourhood

EU Poised for Trade Deal with U.S. Ahead of July 9 Deadline

/ Americas / By

The European Union is reportedly prepared to finalize a trade agreement with the United States before the looming July 9 deadline set by President Donald Trump, aimed at averting a threatened 50 percent tariff increase on EU exports. However, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has underscored that “all options remain on the table,” with robust contingency measures in place should negotiations falter.

The European Commission has developed a comprehensive retaliation package that could impose tariffs on U.S. goods valued up to €95 billion if no deal is reached, signaling the EU’s readiness to defend its economic interests firmly.

A Commission spokesperson confirmed Monday that talks are progressing well, with technical and political negotiators currently engaged in detailed discussions in Washington. The objective remains to meet the July 9 deadline, coinciding with Trump’s ultimatum to avoid escalating tariffs from the current 10 percent to as high as 50 percent on EU imports.

Despite this progress, significant divisions persist within the EU. Germany advocates for a swift, sector-specific agreement resembling the UK-style deal, which would retain tariffs at around 10 percent and secure quotas, especially protecting its vital automotive industry. Conversely, France urges caution to prevent any erosion of regulatory standards and to maintain the EU’s credibility within the World Trade Organization framework. French Finance Minister Éric Lombard has even proposed extending negotiations beyond July 9 to ensure a thorough and equitable outcome.

The European Parliament has voiced strong concerns about protecting the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA), key regulations governing digital trade and market fairness. While the Commission maintains that these domestic laws are non-negotiable, discussions continue on potential flexibility in enforcement mechanisms, reflecting the delicate balance between trade concessions and regulatory sovereignty.

U.S. pressure remains intense, with the Trump administration pushing for the inclusion of EU digital regulations and urging the bloc to unilaterally reduce tariffs on American goods. The U.S. also seeks greater market access, particularly in sectors like automobiles and steel, which are central to its reshoring strategy. Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s hopes for an exemption of German cars from tariffs have been met with skepticism and criticism from other member states.

To address the significant U.S.–EU trade imbalance, estimated at around €50 billion, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič has proposed increasing EU imports of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG), soybeans, and defense equipment. This reciprocal market access offer forms part of the EU’s strategy to demonstrate goodwill and facilitate a balanced trade relationship.

EU Concessions

In a somewhat under-the-radar concession to the United States, the European Commission recently classified imports from the U.S. as “low risk” under its new anti-deforestation directive. This classification is part of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which aims to prevent products linked to deforestation from entering the European market. The move came after intense pressure from the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), which has criticized the EU’s anti-deforestation rules as a “non-tariff barrier” and a form of disguised protectionism that unfairly restricts American exports.

The EUDR imposes strict bureaucratic requirements on trade partners exporting commodities such as cocoa, coffee, soy, palm oil, and beef to the EU. These rules include mandatory due diligence and traceability obligations, requiring companies to prove that their products are not linked to deforestation or forest degradation. While the U.S. welcomed the “low risk” classification, it has repeatedly urged the EU to delay enforcement and provide clearer guidance, warning that the regulation could disrupt billions of dollars in U.S. agricultural exports if implemented too rapidly or rigidly.

However, the directive has also sparked tensions beyond the transatlantic relationship. Southeast Asian producers of palm oil, notably Malaysia, have expressed strong concerns about the EU’s classification system, which labels their imports as “standard risk.” This distinction is viewed as unfair by many, especially since Malaysia has made significant progress in reducing deforestation, supported by its stringent Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certification. NGOs have acknowledged Malaysia’s advances, which include reforestation efforts and maintaining forest canopy well above EU averages.

Despite these achievements, the EU continues to refuse recognition of the MSPO standard as equivalent to its own regulations, unlike the United Kingdom, which has accepted it. The latest version of the MSPO standard is reportedly even stricter than the EU’s anti-deforestation rules, yet this has not altered Brussels’s position. This refusal has caused frustration among Malaysian producers and governments, who argue that the EU’s approach imposes unnecessary bureaucratic burdens and undermines efforts to promote sustainable palm oil production.

The controversy highlights the broader challenges the EU faces in balancing environmental ambitions with trade diplomacy. While the anti-deforestation directive aims to uphold high sustainability standards, its implementation risks alienating key trading partners and complicating supply chains. The EU’s willingness to grant “low risk” status to U.S. imports signals some flexibility, but the ongoing dispute with Southeast Asian producers underscores the delicate negotiations ahead as Brussels seeks to enforce its green agenda without triggering trade disputes or accusations of protectionism.

A new EU – CPTPP alternative to the WTO?

Beyond bilateral negotiations, the EU is exploring strategic alternatives to bolster its global trade position. President von der Leyen has suggested the possibility of the EU joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which includes the UK, signaling a commitment to rules-based free trade.

In addition, the European Commission is actively promoting a bold new vision for global trade governance as an alternative to the increasingly gridlocked World Trade Organization (WTO). Speaking recently, President von der Leyen emphasized the urgent need for a modernized and more effective trade framework that can better address today’s complex challenges, from digital trade and sustainability to fair competition and dispute resolution.

The EU-led initiative aims to establish a coalition of like-minded countries committed to upholding transparent, enforceable rules that reflect the realities of 21st-century commerce. This “open plurilateral” approach would allow willing nations to cooperate on key trade issues without waiting for consensus among all WTO members, which has long stalled progress. The new framework would focus on areas such as environmental standards, digital services, intellectual property, and labor protections, setting a higher bar for global trade practices.

Von der Leyen described this effort as a way to “revitalize the rules-based trading system” and provide a credible alternative to protectionism and unilateralism. The EU hopes that by leading this initiative, it can shape a more resilient, fair, and sustainable global trade order that aligns with its values and economic interests.

As the July 9 deadline approaches, the EU aims to secure a deal that reduces tariffs to approximately 10 percent without compromising its regulatory standards or triggering internal discord among member states. The outcome of these high-stakes negotiations will shape the future of transatlantic trade and the EU’s role in the global economic order.

© 2022 Copyright – All Rights Reserved by European Neighbourhood Monitor. – About | Privacy Policy