European Neighbourhood Monitor

Online magazine highlighting research, news and analysis covering the European Neighbourhood

COP30 Highlights the Environmental Damage Inflicted by Brazil’s Soy Industry

/ Americas / By

As Brazil prepares to host COP30 in Belém in 2025, attention is focusing on a complex paradox at the heart of its climate policy: how to present itself as a leader in forest protection while remaining one of the world’s largest producers of soy — a crop closely linked to deforestation in the Amazon.

A Global Commodity, a Local Cost

Soybeans are among the world’s most traded agricultural commodities, used mainly for animal feed, aquaculture, and biodiesel. A smaller share goes into soy-based foods such as tofu, tempeh, and plant-based milks. Yet the growing demand for both meat and vegetarian protein substitutes has created relentless pressure for new agricultural land.

Brazil now dedicates more than 40 million hectares — an area larger than Germany — to soy cultivation. Each year, between 500,000 and 800,000 hectares of land are cleared for expansion, equivalent to an area the size of Cyprus. The country produces around 40% of the global soybean supply, with China buying the majority, followed by Spain and other European importers.

The End of the Amazon Soy Moratorium

In August 2025, Brazilian authorities decided to suspend the Amazon Soy Moratorium (ASM), a voluntary agreement that had become one of the most successful private-sector conservation initiatives in the world.

Established in 2006, the moratorium was a sectoral pact in which major commodities traders agreed not to purchase soy grown on land deforested after 2008. The agreement brought together farmers, environmental groups, and international food companies — an unusual coalition that demonstrated the potential for cooperation between business and conservation.

Studies estimate that the ASM helped prevent around 17,000 square kilometers of deforestation in the Amazon, while still allowing soy production to expand significantly on already cleared land. The initiative’s voluntary nature was often cited as one of its greatest strengths, proving that market-driven mechanisms could promote environmental protection without halting economic growth.

Its suspension, however, has raised concerns among environmental organizations and international partners that deforestation rates could rise again just as Brazil takes the global stage at COP30.

Renewed Warnings from Environmental Groups

Conservation groups have reacted strongly to the decision. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) warned that “without proper safeguards, the soybean industry is causing widespread deforestation and displacement of small farmers and Indigenous peoples around the globe.”

Soy’s environmental footprint is substantial. Although soybeans for oil production occupy around 125 million hectares globally — nearly 30% of all oil crop land — they provide only 28% of the world’s vegetable oil supply, suggesting significant inefficiency.

In Brazil, NGOs argue that soy expansion contributes to deforestation both directly — through the clearing of primary forest for new plantations — and indirectly, by displacing small-scale farmers who move deeper into forest areas to continue subsistence agriculture.

Infrastructure projects built to serve the soy sector, including highways, ports, and storage facilities, also play a major role in environmental degradation. The intensive use of pesticides and fertilizers affects water quality and biodiversity, while high water consumption strains local ecosystems.

Brazil’s agricultural sector, led by soy cultivation, is responsible for roughly three-quarters of the country’s total CO₂ emissions — a figure that underscores the challenge facing a nation now hosting the world’s most important climate conference.

A Paradox of Policy and Practice

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has pledged to achieve “zero deforestation in the Amazon,” and his government has restored much of the country’s international environmental credibility after years of setbacks. Yet balancing those goals with the demands of agribusiness — a cornerstone of Brazil’s economy — remains politically difficult.

This contradiction is symbolically visible even in the logistics of COP30 itself. Environmental researchers have questioned the construction of a new 13-kilometer road through rainforest areas to connect Belém’s airport with the conference venue. While the government describes the project as “sustainable infrastructure,” with wildlife crossings and solar lighting, critics see it as an example of climate diplomacy undermined by its own footprint.

Searching for a Sustainable Future

As delegates prepare to discuss forest conservation and climate justice at COP30, Brazil faces a critical test. Reinstating or reforming the Amazon Soy Moratorium could help rebuild trust with international partners and investors seeking deforestation-free supply chains.

Experts argue that new legal frameworks — perhaps transforming the ASM from a voluntary initiative into a binding national standard — would offer more durable protection. Others call for expanding deforestation safeguards beyond the Amazon to include the Cerrado and other biomes, where soy-driven land conversion is accelerating.

Whatever form future regulation takes, the debate around soy production goes to the heart of global climate policy: how to balance economic growth, food security, and environmental preservation.

For Brazil, hosting COP30 is both an opportunity and a risk. The country can use the platform to showcase leadership on sustainable agriculture — or risk highlighting the growing divide between its environmental commitments and its economic realities.

In the end, the story of soy in Brazil reflects a broader truth about the global climate effort: progress depends not only on pledges made at conferences, but on the choices made every day in the world’s fields and forests.

© 2022 Copyright – All Rights Reserved by European Neighbourhood Monitor. – About | Privacy Policy